Cathie Wood’s ARKG bought Ionis, Beam, Veracyte and Scribe Therapeutics. Here are the biotech ETFs that also hold her latest bets.
One fund offers broad sector exposure at 0.08% cost; the other concentrates on 30 biotech stocks with higher volatility but stronger recent returns.
XBI's lower fees and 155-stock portfolio contrast sharply with FBT's concentrated 30-holding approach, though FBT has experienced less volatility over the past five years.
FBT delivered 57.7% returns over one year but with nearly double the maximum drawdown. IYH offers lower costs and steadier performance for risk-averse investors.
FBT delivered 48.5% returns over one year but carries a 0.55% expense ratio and experiences greater volatility. XLV offers lower costs, with an 0.08% expense ratio, as well as broader diversification across 60 healthcare stocks.
Most biotech investors treat FBT and IBB as two names for the same trade, but the structural differences buried in their index methodologies have produced shockingly different outcomes depending on where the market's momentum actually lives.
FBT surged 51.6% in one year but carries higher risk and costs. VHT offers broader diversification at a fraction of the expense ratio.
One fund owns the giants of global healthcare, while the other bets on 30 smaller biotech companies.
FBT delivered 52.4% returns over one year but with deeper drawdowns, while XLV's diversified approach offers lower costs and steadier performance.
First Trust's 30-stock strategy delivered 53.2% returns over one year, but comes with higher concentration risk and a steeper 11-basis-point fee.
This is the newest page. Registered accounts read further back.